• Bioclipse git experiences #1: Strip away unwanted plugins

    This is a series of two posts repeating some content I wrote up back in the Bioclipse days (see also this Scholia page). They both deal with something we were facing: restructuring of version control repositories, while actually keeping the history. For example, you may want to copy or move code from one repository to another. A second use case can be a file that must be removed (there are valid reasons for that). Because these posts are based on Bioclipse work, there will be some specific terminology, but the approach I regularly apply in other situations.
  • What metabolites are found in which species? Nanopublications from Wikidata

    In December I reported about Groovy code to create nanopublications . This has been running for some time now, extracting nanopubs that assert that some metabolite is found in some species. I send the resulting nanopubs to Tobias Kuhn , to populate his Growing Resource of Provenance-Centric Scientific Linked Data (doi:10.1109/eScience.2018.00024, PDF).
  • Creating nanopublications with Groovy

    Yesterday, I struggled some with creating nanopublications with Groovy. My first attempt was an utter failure, but then I discovered Thomas Kuhn’s NanopubCreator and it was downhill from there.
  • Join me in encouraging the ACS to join the Initiative for Open Citations

    My research is into abstract representation of chemical information, important for other research to be performed. Indeed, my work is generally reused, but knowing which research fields my work is used in, or which societal problems it is helping solve, is not easily retrieved or determined. Efforts like WikiCite and Scholia do allow me to navigate the citation network, so that I can determine which research fields my output influences and which diseases are studied with methods I proposed. Here’s a network of topics of articles citing my work:
  • Also new this week: "Google Dataset Search"

    There was a lot of Open Science news this week. The announcement of the Google Dataset Search was one of them:
  • New paper: "Integration among databases and data sets to support productive nanotechnology: Challenges and recommendations"

    The U.S.A and European nanosafety communities have a longstanding history of collaboration. On both sides there are working groups, NanoWG and WG-F (previously called WG4) of the NanoSafety Cluster. I have been chair of WG4 for about three years and still active in the group, though in the past half year, without dedicated funding, less active. That is already changing again with the imminent start of the NanoCommons project.
  • Winter solstice challenge: what is your Open Knowledge score?

    Hi all, welcome to this winter solstice challenge! Umm, to not give our southern hemisphere colleagues not a disadvantage, as their winter solstice has already passes, you’re up for a summer solstice challenge!