• Does ChemSpider really violate Open Data with CC SA?

    ChemSpider is afraid they are doing something bad because they release their data as CC-BY-SA. Because, John Wilbanks says in Peter’s blog:
  • Re: What should a Nature Chemistry paper look like?

    Neil wondered “what a Nature Chemistry paper should look like”, and asked the following questions. Below are my answers.
  • Wicked chemistry and unit testing

    After a discussion on starting development releases for CDK on cdk-devel, the discussion continued on the state of the CDK atom typer. Dan and Rajarshi have done tests in the past against PubChem and its DTP/NCI subset. Rajarshi made his analysis part of CDK Nightly, and provides but a summary (which seems broken: zero fails) and a detailed list.
  • Comparing JUnit test results between CDK trunk/ and a branch #2

    I reported earlier on how to compare unit test results between CDK trunk and a branch. Later, I noted that the diff typically overestimates the fail count, when unit tests had been moved to a different module. Therefore, a sort has to be added. The code is also updated for the SVN directory restructuring:
  • JChemPaint for Bioclipse2

    Today Ola, Jonathan and I have a mini-hack session on getting JChemPaint support ported from Bioclipse1 to Bioclipse2. And, we made some progress:
  • Blog Comments? No, Peer Reviews!

    Via Carbon-Based Curiosities’s blogroll I found a number of new blogs (on top of the list I posted yesterday), and just added them to Chemical blogspace. This is something I found in Infiniflux!:
  • Comments on 'Rethinking software access'

    bbgm was rethinking software access. The blog observes: