<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" ><generator uri="https://jekyllrb.com/" version="4.3.4">Jekyll</generator><link href="https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/feed/by_tag/virus.xml" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" /><link href="https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" /><updated>2026-04-19T09:50:36+00:00</updated><id>https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/feed/by_tag/virus.xml</id><title type="html">chem-bla-ics</title><subtitle>Chemblaics (pronounced chem-bla-ics) is the science that uses open science and computers to solve problems in chemistry, biochemistry and related fields.</subtitle><author><name>Egon Willighagen</name></author><entry><title type="html">The power of big numbers</title><link href="https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/2006/12/06/power-of-big-numbers.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="The power of big numbers" /><published>2006-12-06T00:00:00+00:00</published><updated>2006-12-06T00:00:00+00:00</updated><id>https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/2006/12/06/power-of-big-numbers</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/2006/12/06/power-of-big-numbers.html"><![CDATA[<p>Contributions to open data do not have to be large, as long as many people are doing it. The
<a href="http://wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a> is a good example, and <a href="http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/">PubChem</a>
accepts contributions of small databases too (I think). The result can still be large and rather useful, even scientifically.</p>

<p>The latter was recently written down in the paper <em>Internet-based monitoring of influenza-like illness (ILI) in the general
population of the Netherlands during the 2003–2004 influenza season</em> by Marquet et al. (DOI:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458/6/242">10.1186/1471-2458/6/242</a>).
The data was provided by Internet users via <a href="http://www.degrotegriepmeting.nl/">The Great Influenza Survey</a> website. The article states that
the sum of all those small contributions (anonymous website users are asked to fill out a weekly form), yields reliable data. The user is
rewarded by colorful pictures, such as:</p>

<p><img src="/assets/images/alles_2006-12-06.png" alt="" /></p>

<p>If all chemists and biochemists would add information about or properties of one molecule or metabolite to the Wikipedia each month,
one or more commercial database companies will have to change their business model soon. Oh, you already can start doing this
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Chemistry">here</a>.</p>]]></content><author><name>Egon Willighagen</name></author><category term="virus" /><category term="chemometrics" /><category term="justdoi:10.1186/1471-2458/6/242" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[Contributions to open data do not have to be large, as long as many people are doing it. The Wikipedia is a good example, and PubChem accepts contributions of small databases too (I think). The result can still be large and rather useful, even scientifically.]]></summary></entry></feed>