<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" ><generator uri="https://jekyllrb.com/" version="4.3.4">Jekyll</generator><link href="https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/feed/by_tag/altmetrics.xml" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" /><link href="https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" /><updated>2026-04-11T11:30:50+00:00</updated><id>https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/feed/by_tag/altmetrics.xml</id><title type="html">chem-bla-ics</title><subtitle>Chemblaics (pronounced chem-bla-ics) is the science that uses open science and computers to solve problems in chemistry, biochemistry and related fields.</subtitle><author><name>Egon Willighagen</name></author><entry><title type="html">Winter solstice challenge: what is your Open Knowledge score?</title><link href="https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/2017/11/26/winter-solstice-challenge-what-is-your.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Winter solstice challenge: what is your Open Knowledge score?" /><published>2017-11-26T00:00:00+00:00</published><updated>2017-11-26T00:00:00+00:00</updated><id>https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/2017/11/26/winter-solstice-challenge-what-is-your</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/2017/11/26/winter-solstice-challenge-what-is-your.html"><![CDATA[<p><img src="/assets/images/Robert_Snache_-_Spirithands.net_-_Winter_Solstice_Lunar_Eclipse_Startrails_(by).jpg" style="width: 30%; display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; float: right" alt="Photo of a time laps of a starry night, making the stars show as lines in the sky. Source: Wikimedia, CC-BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Robert_Snache_-_Spirithands.net_-_Winter_Solstice_Lunar_Eclipse_Startrails_(by).jpg)" />
Hi all, welcome to this winter solstice challenge! Umm, to not give our southern hemisphere colleagues
not a disadvantage, as their winter solstice has already passes, you’re up for a summer solstice challenge!</p>

<h2 id="introduction">Introduction</h2>

<p>So, you know <a href="http://impactstory.org/">ImpactStory</a> and <a href="http://altmetric.com/">Altmetric.com</a> (if not,
<a href="https://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/search?q=impactstory&amp;max-results=20&amp;by-date=true">browse</a>
<a href="https://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/search?q=altmetric&amp;max-results=20&amp;by-date=true">my blog</a>);
these are wonderful tools to see what people are doing with your work. I hope you already know about
<a href="http://opencitations.net/">OpenCitations</a>, a collaboration of publishers, CrossRef, and many others, to
make all citation data available. They just passed the 50% milestone, congratulations on that amazing
achievement! For the younger scientists it may be worth realizing that for the past 20 years, at least,
this data was copyrighted and not to be used unless you paid. Elsevier is, BTW,
<a href="https://opencitations.wordpress.com/2017/11/24/elsevier-references-dominate-those-that-are-not-open-at-crossref/">the major culprit</a>
still claiming IP on this, but RT this if you are surprised.</p>

<p>So, the reason I introduce both ImpactStory and OpenCitations is the following. Scientific articles are
data and knowledge dense documents. If we did not redirect the reader to other literature. That may give
a more complete sketch of the context, describe a measurement protocol, describe how certain knowledge
was derived, etc. Therefore, just having your article Open Access is not enough: the articles you cite
should be Open Access too. That’s the next phase if really making an effort to have
<a href="https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights">all of humanity benefit from the fruits of science</a>.</p>

<p>I know it is hard already to calculate a “Open Access” score, though ImpactStory does a great job at
that! So, calculating this for your paper and the papers those papers cite is even harder. You may
need to brush up your algorithm and programming skills.</p>

<h2 id="eligibility">Eligibility</h2>

<p>Anyone is allowed to participate. Submission of your entry is done online, e.g. in your blog, in a public
write up, or even a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_notebook_science">open notebook</a>!
However, you need at least on citable research object. That is, it
needs a DOI. Otherwise, I cannot give you the prize (see below). The score should be based on all your
products. Bonus points for those who include software and data citations. Excluding citable object to
boost your score (for example, I would have to exclude my book chapters), is seen as cheating the system.</p>

<p><img src="/assets/images/800px-Global_key-route_main_paths_for_a_citation_network.svg.png" style="width: 40%; display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; float: right" alt="Your article B may cite three articles (C, D, J) but article D also cited articles (F, I). So, your Open Knowledge score is recursive. Source: Wikipedia, CC-BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Global_key-route_main_paths_for_a_citation_network.svg" /></p>

<h2 id="depth">Depth</h2>

<p>Calculating your Open Knowledge score can be done at multiple levels. After all, your article depends
(cites) articles, and your software depends on libraries, but those cited articles and software
dependencies recursively also cite articles and/or software. The complexity is non-trivial, making it
a perfect solstice challenge indeed!</p>

<h2 id="prizes">Prizes</h2>

<p>The prize I have to offer is my continued commitment to Open Science, but that you already get for
free and may not be enough boon. So, instead, soon after the winter/summer solstice at the end of this year,
I will blog about your research boosting your <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altmetrics">#altmetrics</a>
scores. Yes, I will actually read and try to understand it!</p>

<p>And because there is the results and the method, neither of which exist yet, there are two categories! I just
<strong><em>doubled your chance</em></strong> of winning! That’s because humanity is worth it! One prize for the best tool to calculated
your Open Knowledge score, and one prize for the researcher with the highest score.</p>

<h2 id="audience-prize">Audience Prize</h2>

<p>If someone feels a need to organize an audience prize, this is very much encouraged! (Assuming Open approaches, of course :)</p>]]></content><author><name>Egon Willighagen</name></author><category term="solstice" /><category term="altmetrics" /><category term="opencitations" /><summary type="html"><![CDATA[Hi all, welcome to this winter solstice challenge! Umm, to not give our southern hemisphere colleagues not a disadvantage, as their winter solstice has already passes, you’re up for a summer solstice challenge!]]></summary><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/assets/images/Robert_Snache_-_Spirithands.net_-_Winter_Solstice_Lunar_Eclipse_Startrails_(by).jpg" /><media:content medium="image" url="https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/assets/images/Robert_Snache_-_Spirithands.net_-_Winter_Solstice_Lunar_Eclipse_Startrails_(by).jpg" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" /></entry></feed>