{
  "version": "https://jsonfeed.org/version/1.1",
  "title": "chem-bla-ics",
  "description": "Chemblaics (pronounced chem-bla-ics) is the science that uses open science and computers to solve problems in chemistry, biochemistry and related fields.",
  "home_page_url": "https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/",
  "feed_url": "https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/2009/10/20/crossref-writes-up-rss-usage.json",
  "icon": "https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/assets/images/chem-bla-ics_logo.png",
  "language": "en",
  "authors": [
    {
      "name": "Egon Willighagen",
      "url": "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-0286",
      "_orcid": "0000-0001-7542-0286"
    }
  ],
  "items": [

    {
      "id": "https://doi.org/10.59350/j81e1-a3x41",
      "url": "https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/2009/10/20/crossref-writes-up-rss-usage.html",
      "title": "CrossRef writes up RSS usage recommendations",
      "content_html": "<p><a href=\"http://www.crossref.org/CrossTech/2009/10/recommendations_on_rss_feeds_f.html\">CrossTech announced</a> that a <a href=\"http://www.crossref.org/\">CrossRef</a>\nworking group has written a <a href=\"http://oxford.crossref.org/best_practice/rss/\">best practices</a> for the use of RSS feeds by publishers. Nice introduction\nfor anyone who is creating RSS feeds. Only comment I could make, is the lack of other modules. For example, a Chemistry module has been proposed by\nus 5 years ago already (DOI:<a href=\"http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ci034244p\">10.1021/ci034244p</a>) and about which I blogged on\n<a href=\"http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/search?q=CMLRSS\">several occasions</a>.</p>\n\n<p>Below is the <a href=\"http://cb.openmolecules.net/atom.php?category=&amp;type=latest_inchis\">CMLRSS feed</a> of <a href=\"http://cb.openmolecules.net/\">Chemical blogspace</a>.</p>\n\n<p><img src=\"/assets/images/cmlrss_Cb2.png\" alt=\"\" /></p>\n\n<p>Of course, publishers can take advantage of such modules, using the <a href=\"http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names/\">XML Namespaces</a> technology. The <em>best practices</em>\nuses that for a <a href=\"http://dublincore.org/\">Dublin Core</a> and a <a href=\"http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/\">PRISM</a> extension. The here discussed CML\nextension is another one, but the point is, that you can basically plug in any module.</p>\n\n<h4>References</h4>\n<div class=\"csl-bib-body\">\n    <div class=\"csl-entry\">Murray-Rust, P., Rzepa, H. S., Williamson, M. J., &#38; Willighagen, E. L. (2004). Chemical Markup, XML, and the World Wide Web. 5. Applications of Chemical Metadata in RSS Aggregators. <i>Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences</i>, <i>44</i>(2), 462–469. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci034244p <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.1021/CI034244P\">CrossRef</a> <a href=\"https://qlever.scholia.wiki/doi/10.1021/CI034244P\">Scholia</a></div>\n  </div>",
      "summary": "CrossTech announced that a CrossRef working group has written a best practices for the use of RSS feeds by publishers. Nice introduction for anyone who is creating RSS feeds. Only comment I could make, is the lack of other modules. For example, a Chemistry module has been proposed by us 5 years ago already (DOI:10.1021/ci034244p) and about which I blogged on several occasions.",
      "image": "https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/assets/images/cmlrss_Cb2.png",
      "date_published": "2009-10-20T00:00:00+00:00",
      "date_modified": "2009-10-20T00:00:00+00:00",
      "tags": ["cml","rss","xml"],
      "_references": [
        
          
          
            { "url": "https://doi.org/10.1021/CI034244P", "doi": "10.1021/CI034244P"
             }
            
          
        ],
      
      
      
      
      
      
        "authors": [ { "name": "Egon Willighagen", "url": "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-0286" } ]
      
    }

  ]
}