{
  "version": "https://jsonfeed.org/version/1.1",
  "title": "chem-bla-ics",
  "description": "Chemblaics (pronounced chem-bla-ics) is the science that uses open science and computers to solve problems in chemistry, biochemistry and related fields.",
  "home_page_url": "https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/",
  "feed_url": "https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/2006/12/09/h-index-in-chemoinformatics.json",
  "icon": "https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/assets/images/chem-bla-ics_logo.png",
  "language": "en",
  "authors": [
    {
      "name": "Egon Willighagen",
      "url": "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-0286",
      "_orcid": "0000-0001-7542-0286"
    }
  ],
  "items": [

    {
      "id": "https://doi.org/10.59350/me9g4-sa136",
      "url": "https://chem-bla-ics.linkedchemistry.info/2006/12/09/h-index-in-chemoinformatics.html",
      "title": "H-index in chemoinformatics",
      "content_html": "<p><a href=\"http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/blogs/murrayrust/\">Peter</a> <a href=\"https://blogs.ch.cam.ac.uk/pmr/2006/12/08/impact-factors-hirsch-erdos-and-pauling/\">blogged <i class=\"fa-solid fa-recycle fa-xs\"></i></a> about the\n<a href=\"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-index\">h-index</a>, which is a measure for ones scientific impact. He used\n<a href=\"http://scholar.google.com/\">Google Scholar</a>, but I do not feel that that database is clean enough. I believe a better\nsource would be the <a href=\"http://portal.isiknowledge.com/portal.cgi?DestApp=WOS&amp;Func=Frame\">ISI Web-of-Science</a>.</p>\n\n<p>Therefore, I composed a list of h-indices of my own, ordered by value. The choice of authors is biased to the\n<a href=\"http://www.blueobelisk.org/\">Blue Obelisk</a> and the <a href=\"http://cdk.sf.net/\">CDK</a>, has some personal touches\n(<a href=\"http://www.cac.science.ru.nl/people/lbuydens/\">Buydens</a> are <a href=\"http://www.cac.science.ru.nl/people/rwehrens/\">Wehrens</a>\nare my PhD supervisors) and some names that put the rest into perspective:</p>\n\n<div class=\"language-plaintext highlighter-rouge\"><div class=\"highlight\"><pre class=\"highlight\"><code>query\t\th-index\t#pubs\nBENDER A\t41\t222\nWILLETT P\t37\t302\nGASTEIGER J\t33\t212\nRZEPA HS\t25\t236\nBUYDENS LMC\t18\t108\nGLEN RC\t\t18\t78\nWEHRENS R\t11\t47\nMURRAY-RUST P*\t9\t41\nSTEINBECK C\t9\t29\nFECHNER U\t6\t12\nGUHA R\t\t4\t24\nWILLIGHAGEN E*\t4\t9\nWEGNER JK\t3\t9\nLUTTMANN E\t2\t4\n</code></pre></div></div>\n\n<p>Of course, there are many comments on this. Like any measurement, take into account the error. Sources of error\ninclude, but are not limited to, ambiguity in the query. The most notable example of this, I think, is\n<a href=\"http://andygoesus.blogspot.com/\">Andreas Bender</a>; I don’t think he has been <em>that</em> successful :) Also,\n<a href=\"http://cheminfo.informatics.indiana.edu/~rguha/\">Rajarshi Guha</a>’s h-index was reported 6, but the list included\ntwo articles from the 70-ies and 80-ies, which I do not think are actually really his.</p>\n\n<p>Feel free to suggest other names, query corrections, tips, and I will add or work on those too.</p>",
      "summary": "Peter blogged about the h-index, which is a measure for ones scientific impact. He used Google Scholar, but I do not feel that that database is clean enough. I believe a better source would be the ISI Web-of-Science.",
      
      "date_published": "2006-12-09T00:00:00+00:00",
      "date_modified": "2025-04-20T00:00:00+00:00",
      "tags": ["cheminf"],
      
      
      
      
      
      
        "authors": [ { "name": "Egon Willighagen", "url": "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-0286" } ]
      
    }

  ]
}